Electrical Engineering 244 Fall 2002

Electrical Engineering 244 Fall 2002

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Kurt Keutzer (below)
M. Orshansky (below)

Professor Keutzer 14 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.1/ 7 ± 0.9
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4/ 7 ± 0.8
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 4.1/ 5 ± 0.7
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.7
Relates to students as individuals 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.6/ 5 ± 0.8
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.2/ 5 ± 0.9
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3/ 5 ± 0.5
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.6/ 5 ± 0.7
 
Professor Orshansky 14 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.8/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.0/ 7 ± 1.0
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 2.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.4/ 5 ± 0.6
 

[Statistics for Fall 2002]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.