Electrical Engineering 241 Spring 1992

Electrical Engineering 241 Spring 1992

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Jan M. Rabaey (below)

Professor Rabaey 22 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Lectures clearly 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Is well prepared 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Summarizes major points 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
States objectives for each class session 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Has genuine interest in students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students out of class 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Motivates students to do their best work 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 2.0/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text is beneficial 2.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.4/ 7 ± 0.5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.5/ 7 ± 0.5
 

[Statistics for Spring 1992]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.