Electrical Engineering 145B Spring 2001

Electrical Engineering 145B Spring 2001

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Sharmila Majumdar (below)
David Saloner (below)
TA Annette Antiniw (below)

Professor Majumdar 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.7/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.3/ 7 ± 0.8
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.7/ 5 ± 0.8
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 2.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1/ 5 ± 0.8
The required text/notes is beneficial 2.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.3/ 5 ± 0.6
 
Professor Saloner 10 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.0/ 7 ± 1.1
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.1/ 7 ± 1.1
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 2.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.3/ 5 ± 0.9
Relates to students as individuals 3.6/ 5 ± 0.7
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9/ 5 ± 0.9
The required text/notes is beneficial 2.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.3/ 5 ± 0.6
 
Teaching Assistant Annette Antiniw
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 2001]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.