Electrical Engineering 136 Spring 1990

Electrical Engineering 136 Spring 1990

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Shyh Wang (below)
TA Sol Dijali (below)

Professor Shyh Wang 3 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 3.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Lectures clearly 2.3/ 5 ± 3.0
Is well prepared 4.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.3/ 5 ± 3.7
Summarizes major points 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
States objectives for each class session 2.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Encourages questions from students 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 2.3/ 5 ± 3.0
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Has genuine interest in students 3.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Relates to students as individuals 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Is accessible to students out of class 3.0/ 5 ± 3.5
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 2.0/ 5 ± 3.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 1.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 2.3/ 5 ± 3.0
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 2.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Motivates students to do their best work 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 2.7/ 5 ± 3.0
The required text is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 3.3/ 7 ± 5.2
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.7/ 7 ± 1.5
 
Teaching Assistant Sol Dijali
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 1990]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.