Electrical Engineering 125 Spring 2001

Electrical Engineering 125 Spring 2001

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Murat Cenk Cavusoglu (below)
Frank Tendick (below)
TA David Feygin (below)

Professor Cavusoglu 10 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.3/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.9/ 5 ± 0.8
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.4/ 5 ± 0.7
 
Professor Tendick 10 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.9/ 7 ± 0.5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6/ 7 ± 0.7
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.6/ 5 ± 0.8
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.2/ 5 ± 0.8
 
Teaching Assistant David Feygin
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 2001]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.