Electrical Engineering 122 Spring 2007

Electrical Engineering 122 Spring 2007

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Shyam Parekh (below)
A Wolisz (below)
TAs Christophe Choumert (below)
Nikhil Shetty (below)

Professor Shyam Parekh 17 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 3.9/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.4/ 7 ± 0.7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 2.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 2.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.8/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.6/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Professor Wolisz 17 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.6/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.5/ 7 ± 0.7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.7/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.6/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Christophe Choumert
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Nikhil Shetty
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 2007]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.