Electrical Engineering 121 Spring 2009

Electrical Engineering 121 Spring 2009

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Anant Sahai (below)
TA Vinayak Nagpal (below)

Professor Sahai 13 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.2/ 7 ± 1.0
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4/ 7 ± 1.1
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.9/ 5 ± 0.7
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.4/ 5 ± 0.8
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 3.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Relates to students as individuals 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.6/ 5 ± 0.7
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.9/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.6/ 5 ± 0.8
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 2.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text/notes is beneficial 1.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
 
Teaching Assistant Vinayak Nagpal 12 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Is well prepared 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Communicates ideas effectively 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Answers questions accurately 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible during office hours 4.1/ 5 ± 0.7
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
 

[Statistics for Spring 2009]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.