Electrical Engineering 120 Spring 2006

Electrical Engineering 120 Spring 2006

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Babak Ayazifar (below)
Pravin Varaiya (below)
TAs Ke Lu (below)
Bharathwaj (Bart) Muthuswamy (below)
Xiaoyi Tang (below)

Professor Ayazifar 84 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.2/ 7 ± 0.2
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6/ 7 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7/ 5 ± 0.1
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7/ 5 ± 0.1
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.6/ 5 ± 0.1
Encourages questions from students 4.8/ 5 ± 0.1
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7/ 5 ± 0.1
Relates to students as individuals 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.7/ 5 ± 0.1
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9/ 5 ± 0.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.3/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Professor Varaiya 82 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.5/ 7 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 3.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9/ 5 ± 0.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.1/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Teaching Assistant Ke Lu 51 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Is well prepared 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Communicates ideas effectively 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.1
Answers questions accurately 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible during office hours 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Teaching Assistant Bharathwaj (Bart) Muthuswamy 43 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Is well prepared 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Communicates ideas effectively 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Answers questions accurately 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible during office hours 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Xiaoyi Tang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 2006]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.