| Professor John Stephen Smith |
9 Respondents |
|---|
| Discusses points of view other than his/her own |
4.0 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Discusses recent developments in the field |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Gives references for more interesting & invovled points |
3.6 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Emphasizes conceptual understanding |
3.7 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Lectures clearly |
3.7 | / 5 ± 0.9 | |
| Is well prepared |
4.0 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
3.3 | / 5 ± 1.0 | |
| Summarizes major points |
3.2 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| States objectives for each class session |
3.0 | / 5 ± 0.9 | |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.9 | |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
3.6 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
3.1 | / 5 ± 1.2 | |
| Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter |
3.9 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Encourages questions from students |
3.5 | / 5 ± 0.9 | |
| Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.9 | |
| Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding |
3.4 | / 5 ± 1.0 | |
| Has genuine interest in students |
3.8 | / 5 ± 0.9 | |
| Gives personal help to students having problems in course |
3.4 | / 5 ± 1.1 | |
| Relates to students as individuals |
3.6 | / 5 ± 1.1 | |
| Is accessible to students out of class |
3.5 | / 5 ± 1.2 | |
| Is valued for advice not directly related to the course |
2.7 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
2.3 | / 5 ± 1.1 | |
| Is enthusiastic about his/her subject |
3.3 | / 5 ± 1.2 | |
| Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice |
2.3 | / 5 ± 1.2 | |
| Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching |
3.7 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Motivates students to do their best work |
2.8 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
2.8 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Stimulates your interest in the subject |
2.7 | / 5 ± 1.0 | |
| Gives exams permitting students to show understanding |
3.0 | / 5 ± 0.9 | |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.9 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.9 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Course is concerned with theory more than its application |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| The required text is beneficial |
4.0 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.0 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
4.5 | / 7 ± 0.7 | |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
4.8 | / 7 ± 1.2 | |
| |
| Professor Whinnery |
9 Respondents |
|---|
| Discusses points of view other than his/her own |
3.6 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Discusses recent developments in the field |
3.8 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Gives references for more interesting & invovled points |
3.4 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Emphasizes conceptual understanding |
3.4 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Lectures clearly |
4.0 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Is well prepared |
4.4 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.3 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Summarizes major points |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| States objectives for each class session |
3.4 | / 5 ± 0.9 | |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.2 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter |
4.7 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Encourages questions from students |
3.4 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not |
3.0 | / 5 ± 1.0 | |
| Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding |
3.2 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Has genuine interest in students |
3.4 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Gives personal help to students having problems in course |
4.0 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Relates to students as individuals |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.9 | |
| Is accessible to students out of class |
4.3 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Is valued for advice not directly related to the course |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Is enthusiastic about his/her subject |
3.7 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching |
3.8 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Motivates students to do their best work |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.0 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Stimulates your interest in the subject |
3.0 | / 5 ± 1.0 | |
| Gives exams permitting students to show understanding |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.8 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Course is concerned with theory more than its application |
3.4 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| The required text is beneficial |
4.0 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
2.9 | / 5 ± 0.8 | |
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.0 | / 7 ± 0.9 | |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
4.8 | / 7 ± 1.1 | |
| |
| Teaching Assistant K. Heppel |
|---|
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
|
| |
