Electrical Engineering 117B Spring 1989

Electrical Engineering 117B Spring 1989

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor D.J. Angelakos (below)
TA Sam Osofsky (below)

Professor Angelakos 4 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.5/ 5 ± 1.6
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.5/ 5 ± 1.6
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.5/ 5 ± 1.6
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Lectures clearly 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is well prepared 4.5/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Summarizes major points 3.5/ 5 ± 1.0
States objectives for each class session 2.5/ 5 ± 1.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.5/ 5 ± 2.7
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5/ 5 ± 1.0
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3/ 5 ± 1.6
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Encourages questions from students 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 3.8/ 5 ± 1.6
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 4.7/ 5 ± 1.0
Has genuine interest in students 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Relates to students as individuals 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is accessible to students out of class 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.5/ 5 ± 1.0
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Motivates students to do their best work 4.3/ 5 ± 1.6
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3/ 5 ± 1.6
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 1.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.3/ 5 ± 1.0
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.5/ 5 ± 1.6
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3/ 5 ± 1.0
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 3.7/ 5 ± 2.4
The required text is beneficial 4.5/ 5 ± 1.0
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.3/ 5 ± 1.9
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3/ 7 ± 1.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.8/ 7 ± 0.8
 
Teaching Assistant Sam Osofsky
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 1989]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.