| Professor John Stephen Smith |
31 Respondents |
|---|
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
3.3 | / 7 ± 0.5 | |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
3.3 | / 7 ± 0.7 | |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
2.7 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
2.9 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
2.9 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
2.3 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
2.9 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Encourages questions from students |
3.6 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
3.4 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Relates to students as individuals |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours |
3.7 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
3.2 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
2.9 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| The required text/notes is beneficial |
2.8 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
2.8 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| |
| Teaching Assistant M. Maharbiz |
|---|
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
|
| |
| Teaching Assistant V. Naik |
|---|
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
|
| |
| Teaching Assistant X. Vipul |
|---|
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
|
| |
