Electrical Engineering 114 Spring 1992

Electrical Engineering 114 Spring 1992

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Felix F. Wu (below)

Professor Felix F. Wu 5 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.0/ 5 ± 1.0
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.2/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.2/ 5 ± 1.0
Lectures clearly 4.2/ 5 ± 1.0
Is well prepared 4.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Summarizes major points 4.2/ 5 ± 1.0
States objectives for each class session 3.6/ 5 ± 1.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8/ 5 ± 1.0
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 1.2
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 4.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.0/ 5 ± 1.0
Has genuine interest in students 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 4.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students out of class 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 3.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.6/ 5 ± 1.1
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Motivates students to do their best work 3.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 3.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 1.6
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2/ 5 ± 1.0
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 3.2/ 5 ± 1.0
The required text is beneficial 4.0/ 5 ± 1.2
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.6/ 5 ± 1.4
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.2/ 7 ± 1.0
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.2/ 7 ± 1.2
 

[Statistics for Spring 1992]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.