Electrical Engineering 114 Spring 1989

Electrical Engineering 114 Spring 1989

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Seth R. Sanders (below)

Professor Sanders 2 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.5/ 5 ± 18.9
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Lectures clearly 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is well prepared 4.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Summarizes major points 3.5/ 5 ± 18.9
States objectives for each class session 4.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.5/ 5 ± 18.9
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 3.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Has genuine interest in students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Relates to students as individuals 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is accessible to students out of class 4.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 3.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Motivates students to do their best work 3.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.5/ 5 ± 18.9
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.5/ 5 ± 18.9
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Pace of the course is too fast 2.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
The required text is beneficial 2.5/ 5 ± 18.9
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0/ 7 ± 25.2
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.5/ 7 ± 18.9
 

[Statistics for Spring 1989]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.