Electrical Engineering 104 Spring 1992 Section 2

Electrical Engineering 104 Spring 1992 Section 2

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Leon O. Chua (below)
TAs Edwar Knightly (below)
Karl Petty (below)

Professor Chua 20 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Lectures clearly 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Is well prepared 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Summarizes major points 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
States objectives for each class session 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 2.9/ 5 ± 0.7
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Has genuine interest in students 3.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students out of class 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.6/ 5 ± 0.7
Motivates students to do their best work 3.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text is beneficial 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.9/ 7 ± 0.7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.1/ 7 ± 0.6
 
Teaching Assistant Edwar Knightly
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Karl Petty
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 1992]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.