Electrical Engineering 104 Spring 1992 Section 1

Electrical Engineering 104 Spring 1992 Section 1

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Ernest S. Kuh (below)
TAs Edwar Knightly (below)
Karl Petty (below)

Professor Kuh 29 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 3.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Lectures clearly 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Is well prepared 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Summarizes major points 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
States objectives for each class session 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Has genuine interest in students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 3.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students out of class 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 3.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Motivates students to do their best work 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text is beneficial 3.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.1/ 7 ± 0.5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.9/ 7 ± 0.5
 
Teaching Assistant Edwar Knightly
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Karl Petty
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 1992]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.