Electrical Engineering 104 Fall 1992 Section 2

Electrical Engineering 104 Fall 1992 Section 2

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Leon O. Chua (below)
TA Kartik Prihadi (below)

Professor Chua 26 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 2.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Lectures clearly 3.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Is well prepared 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Summarizes major points 3.6/ 5 ± 0.5
States objectives for each class session 3.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions from students 2.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 2.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Has genuine interest in students 2.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 2.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 2.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible to students out of class 2.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 2.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 2.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Motivates students to do their best work 2.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Stimulates your interest in the subject 2.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text is beneficial 2.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.0/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 3.7/ 7 ± 0.6
 
Teaching Assistant Kartik Prihadi
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Fall 1992]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.