Electrical Engineering 1 Spring 2001

Electrical Engineering 1 Spring 2001

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Roger Doering (below)
Richard M. White (below)
TAs Jason Dimkoff (below)
Ranjana Sahai (below)

Professor Doering 11 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.5/ 7 ± 1.2
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.5/ 7 ± 1.0
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 3.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.2/ 5 ± 1.1
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.3/ 5 ± 1.1
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Pace of the course is too fast 3.0/ 5 ± 1.0
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.6/ 5 ± 0.9
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.4/ 5 ± 0.7
 
Professor White 11 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.1/ 7 ± 1.0
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.8/ 7 ± 1.1
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Relates to students as individuals 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.1/ 5 ± 0.8
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Pace of the course is too fast 2.8/ 5 ± 1.0
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.6/ 5 ± 0.9
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.3/ 5 ± 0.7
 
Teaching Assistant Jason Dimkoff
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Ranjana Sahai
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 2001]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.