Electrical Engineering 1 Spring 2000

Electrical Engineering 1 Spring 2000

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Roger Doering (below)
Richard M. White (below)
TA J. Sham (below)

Professor Doering 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.3/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.1/ 7 ± 1.0
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.8
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.3/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.8/ 5 ± 0.6
 
Professor White 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.3/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.1/ 7 ± 1.0
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.8
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 2.4/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.9/ 5 ± 0.4
 
Teaching Assistant J. Sham
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 2000]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.