Electrical Engineering 1 Fall 2000

Electrical Engineering 1 Fall 2000

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Roger Doering (below)
Richard M. White (below)

Professor Doering 14 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 2.8/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 3.2/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 2.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Identifies what he/she considers important 2.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 2.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 2.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.1/ 5 ± 0.7
Relates to students as individuals 2.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Is accessible to students outside of class 2.9/ 5 ± 1.0
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.6/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 2.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 2.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 3.5/ 5 ± 0.7
The required text/notes is beneficial 2.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
 
Professor White 15 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 3.7/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 3.8/ 7 ± 0.7
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.2/ 5 ± 0.7
Has an interesting style of presentation 2.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 3.1/ 5 ± 0.8
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 2.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1/ 5 ± 0.8
The required text/notes is beneficial 2.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
 

[Statistics for Fall 2000]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.