| Professor Wagner |
35 Respondents |
|---|
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
6.1 | / 7 ± 0.4 | |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
6.2 | / 7 ± 0.3 | |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
4.7 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
5.0 | / 5 ± 0.0 | |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.5 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
4.4 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
4.4 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Encourages questions from students |
4.5 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.4 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Relates to students as individuals |
4.4 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
4.5 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours |
4.6 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
4.5 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
4.5 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
4.5 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.9 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| The required text/notes is beneficial |
3.6 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
3.2 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| |
| Teaching Assistant Amir Kamil |
31 Respondents |
|---|
| Helpful in understanding material |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Is well prepared |
4.6 | / 5 ± 0.2 | |
| Communicates ideas effectively |
4.0 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter |
4.4 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Answers questions accurately |
4.2 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Encourages questions and/or class discussion |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Is aware when students are having difficulty |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Is accessible during office hours |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness |
4.0 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| |
