Computer Science 61C Spring 1995

Computer Science 61C Spring 1995

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Michael J. Clancy (below)
Brian K. Harvey (below)
TAs Srini Gopalaswamy (below)
W. Gosti (below)
W. Siu (below)

Professor Clancy 81 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.6/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4/ 7 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 2.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9/ 5 ± 0.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Professor Harvey 83 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.2/ 7 ± 0.2
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8/ 7 ± 0.2
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.1
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 3.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 3.0/ 5 ± 0.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.5/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Teaching Assistant Srini Gopalaswamy
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant W. Gosti
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant W. Siu
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 1995]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.