Computer Science 61BL Fall 2005

Computer Science 61BL Fall 2005

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Michael J. Clancy (below)
TAs Paul Hale (below)
Rehan Ryan Waliany (below)
Leonard Wei (below)

Professor Clancy 51 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.4/ 7 ± 0.4
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.3/ 7 ± 0.4
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 2.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 2.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Paul Hale 18 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is well prepared 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Communicates ideas effectively 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Answers questions accurately 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible during office hours 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
 
Teaching Assistant Rehan Ryan Waliany
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Leonard Wei 17 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is well prepared 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Communicates ideas effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Answers questions accurately 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
 

[Statistics for Fall 2005]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.