Computer Science 61B Spring 2006

Computer Science 61B Spring 2006

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Paul N. Hilfinger (below)
TAs Nam Mai (below)
Rehan Ryan Waliany (below)
Leonard Wei (below)

Professor Hilfinger 62 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.7/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9/ 7 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Teaching Assistant Nam Mai 25 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Is well prepared 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Communicates ideas effectively 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Answers questions accurately 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible during office hours 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Teaching Assistant Rehan Ryan Waliany
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Leonard Wei 16 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is well prepared 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Communicates ideas effectively 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Answers questions accurately 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible during office hours 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
 

[Statistics for Spring 2006]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.