Computer Science 61A Spring 2005

Computer Science 61A Spring 2005

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Brian K. Harvey (below)
TAs Jeff Chiang (below)
David Gelbart (below)
Kevin Lin (below)
Chung-Ming Wu (below)

Professor Harvey 79 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.2/ 7 ± 0.2
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.1/ 7 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7/ 5 ± 0.1
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.7/ 5 ± 0.1
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7/ 5 ± 0.1
Relates to students as individuals 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Teaching Assistant Jeff Chiang
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant David Gelbart
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Kevin Lin 23 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Is well prepared 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Communicates ideas effectively 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Answers questions accurately 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible during office hours 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Chung-Ming Wu 15 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Is well prepared 4.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Answers questions accurately 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible during office hours 4.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.7/ 5 ± 0.6
 

[Statistics for Spring 2005]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.