Computer Science 61A Spring 1998

Computer Science 61A Spring 1998

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Richard J. Fateman (below)
David Forsyth (below)
TAs J. Cantrell (below)
Alvin Chen (below)
H. Duiker (below)
Paul Hale (below)
M. Hopkins (below)
A. Jabbarra (below)
S. Lee (below)
B. Raman (below)
S. Teoh (below)

Professor Fateman 122 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 3.5/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.7/ 7 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 2.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 2.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 1.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 2.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 3.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 2.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 2.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 2.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 2.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 3.4/ 5 ± 0.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Professor Forsyth 116 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.0/ 7 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.3/ 5 ± 0.1
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 3.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 2.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3/ 5 ± 0.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.9/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Teaching Assistant J. Cantrell
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Alvin Chen
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant H. Duiker
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Paul Hale 11 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Is well prepared 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Communicates ideas effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Answers questions accurately 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Is accessible during office hours 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
 
Teaching Assistant M. Hopkins
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant A. Jabbarra
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant S. Lee
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant B. Raman
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant S. Teoh
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 1998]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.