Computer Science 294 Spring 2009 Section 33

Computer Science 294 Spring 2009 Section 33

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Krste Asanovic (below)
David A. Patterson (below)
Koushik Sen (below)

Professor Asanovic 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.6/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.1/ 7 ± 0.8
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3/ 5 ± 0.8
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.7
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Pace of the course is too fast 1.6/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 0.6
 
Professor Patterson 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0/ 7 ± 0.8
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.8
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7/ 5 ± 0.8
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Pace of the course is too fast 1.3/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.2/ 5 ± 0.8
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 1.9/ 5 ± 0.6
 
Professor Sen 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.8/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0/ 7 ± 0.8
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4/ 5 ± 0.8
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.7
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 1.6/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 0.6
 

[Statistics for Spring 2009]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.