Computer Science 294 Fall 2008 Section 26

Computer Science 294 Fall 2008 Section 26

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Satish Rao (below)
Umesh Vazirani (below)

Professor Rao 19 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.0/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.5/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.7/ 5 ± 0.5
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.1/ 5 ± 0.4
 
Professor Vazirani 18 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.2/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.8/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.1/ 5 ± 0.4
 

[Statistics for Fall 2008]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.