Computer Science 294 Spring 2004 Section 4

Computer Science 294 Spring 2004 Section 4

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors David Forsyth (below)
James O'Brien (below)

Professor Forsyth 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.0/ 7 ± 0.4
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.9/ 7 ± 1.0
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Pace of the course is too fast 2.3/ 5 ± 0.8
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 1.8/ 5 ± 0.7
 
Professor O'Brien 11 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.5/ 7 ± 1.1
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.2/ 7 ± 1.0
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.6/ 5 ± 0.9
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 0.8
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9/ 5 ± 0.8
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8/ 5 ± 0.9
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Encourages questions from students 4.1/ 5 ± 0.8
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.9
Relates to students as individuals 4.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.2/ 5 ± 0.8
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.9/ 5 ± 0.9
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.6/ 5 ± 0.9
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 1.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Pace of the course is too fast 2.3/ 5 ± 0.9
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 1.8/ 5 ± 0.7
 

[Statistics for Spring 2004]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.