Computer Science 286 Spring 1992

Computer Science 286 Spring 1992

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Michael Stonebraker (below)

Professor Stonebraker 10 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Lectures clearly 4.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Is well prepared 4.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Summarizes major points 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
States objectives for each class session 4.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 4.3/ 5 ± 0.8
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.9/ 5 ± 0.7
Has genuine interest in students 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students out of class 4.0/ 5 ± 0.8
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 3.8/ 5 ± 0.9
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.2/ 5 ± 0.8
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Motivates students to do their best work 3.9/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 0.7
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.4/ 5 ± 1.0
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 2.5/ 5 ± 0.9
The required text is beneficial 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.7/ 5 ± 0.9
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3/ 7 ± 0.5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.4/ 7 ± 0.6
 

[Statistics for Spring 1992]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.