Computer Science 285 Spring 1991

Computer Science 285 Spring 1991

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Carlo H. Sequin (below)

Professor Sequin 7 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Lectures clearly 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Is well prepared 4.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4/ 5 ± 0.9
Summarizes major points 4.7/ 5 ± 0.5
States objectives for each class session 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions from students 4.6/ 5 ± 0.7
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 4.4/ 5 ± 0.9
Has genuine interest in students 4.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.1/ 5 ± 0.8
Relates to students as individuals 4.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Is accessible to students out of class 4.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Motivates students to do their best work 4.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.6/ 5 ± 0.7
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.6/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0/ 5 ± 0.7
Pace of the course is too fast 1.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 2.0/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text is beneficial Omitted
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.7/ 5 ± 1.1
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.7/ 7 ± 0.5
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0/ 7 ± 1.2
 

[Statistics for Spring 1991]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.