Computer Science 278 Spring 1990

Computer Science 278 Spring 1990

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Umesh Vazirani (below)

Professor Vazirani 12 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.9/ 5 ± 0.8
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Lectures clearly 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Is well prepared 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Summarizes major points 3.8/ 5 ± 0.8
States objectives for each class session 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 2.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Has genuine interest in students 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 4.1/ 5 ± 0.8
Is accessible to students out of class 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 3.5/ 5 ± 0.8
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Motivates students to do their best work 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 2.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
The required text is beneficial 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.7/ 5 ± 0.8
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.2/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.9/ 7 ± 1.0
 

[Statistics for Spring 1990]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.