Computer Science 276 Spring 2002

Computer Science 276 Spring 2002

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Luca Trevisan (below)
David Wagner (below)

Professor Trevisan 8 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.6/ 7 ± 1.1
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.6/ 7 ± 1.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.6/ 5 ± 1.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.0/ 5 ± 0.8
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.4/ 5 ± 1.0
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.4/ 5 ± 1.0
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.6/ 5 ± 1.2
Encourages questions from students 4.0/ 5 ± 1.1
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1/ 5 ± 1.3
Relates to students as individuals 4.1/ 5 ± 1.2
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.5/ 5 ± 0.9
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9/ 5 ± 1.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7/ 5 ± 1.1
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 1.0
Pace of the course is too fast 3.0/ 5 ± 0.9
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.2/ 5 ± 0.8
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.6/ 5 ± 0.4
 
Professor Wagner 6 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.7/ 7 ± 1.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.7/ 7 ± 2.2
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.2/ 5 ± 1.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.5/ 5 ± 1.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3/ 5 ± 1.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.0/ 5 ± 1.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 1.5
Encourages questions from students 4.2/ 5 ± 1.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.2/ 5 ± 1.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.2/ 5 ± 1.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.3/ 5 ± 1.4
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.8/ 5 ± 1.4
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.8/ 5 ± 1.4
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 4.0/ 5 ± 1.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 1.3
Pace of the course is too fast 3.2/ 5 ± 1.2
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.2/ 5 ± 1.0
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.5/ 5 ± 0.5
 

[Statistics for Spring 2002]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.