Computer Science 276 Spring 1989

Computer Science 276 Spring 1989

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Manuel Blum (below)
TA N. Amenta (below)

Professor Manuel Blum 29 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.9/ 5 ± 0.1
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Lectures clearly 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Is well prepared 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Summarizes major points 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
States objectives for each class session 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.9/ 5 ± 0.1
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Has genuine interest in students 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students out of class 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.9/ 5 ± 0.1
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Motivates students to do their best work 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 2.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text is beneficial 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.9/ 7 ± 0.5
 
Teaching Assistant N. Amenta
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 1989]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.