Computer Science 262B Spring 2006

Computer Science 262B Spring 2006

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Eric Brewer (below)
Timothy Roscoe (below)

Professor Brewer 11 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.2/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 4.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 1.9/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.0/ 5 ± 0.5
 
Professor Roscoe 11 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.4/ 7 ± 0.7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 1.9/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.0/ 5 ± 0.5
 

[Statistics for Spring 2006]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.