Computer Science 262B Spring 2002

Computer Science 262B Spring 2002

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Michael Franklin (below)
Kimberly Keeton (below)

Professor Franklin 8 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.1/ 7 ± 0.7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8/ 7 ± 0.8
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 4.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.1/ 5 ± 0.9
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 1.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.4/ 5 ± 0.8
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.0/ 5 ± 0.9
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 1.9/ 5 ± 0.9
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.3/ 5 ± 0.8
 
Professor Keeton 8 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.8/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6/ 7 ± 0.8
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1/ 5 ± 0.7
Encourages questions from students 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.5/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.4/ 5 ± 0.8
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 1.9/ 5 ± 0.8
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.3/ 5 ± 0.8
 

[Statistics for Spring 2002]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.