Computer Science 252 Fall 1991

Computer Science 252 Fall 1991

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Guill Maturana (below)

Professor Maturana 2 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 3.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Lectures clearly 1.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is well prepared 1.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 2.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Summarizes major points 1.5/ 5 ± 6.3
States objectives for each class session 2.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 3.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Encourages questions from students 3.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 2.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Has genuine interest in students 2.5/ 5 ± 18.9
Gives personal help to students having problems in course Omitted
Relates to students as individuals 4.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Is accessible to students out of class 1.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 1.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Has an interesting style of presentation 1.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 2.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 1.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Motivates students to do their best work 1.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 2.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Stimulates your interest in the subject 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 2.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 1.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 2.5/ 5 ± 6.3
Pace of the course is too fast 2.0/ 5 ± 12.6
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 3.0/ 5 ± 12.6
The required text is beneficial 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 2.0/ 7 ± 0.0
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 2.5/ 7 ± 18.9
 

[Statistics for Fall 1991]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.