Home   |   Student Services   |   Industrial Relations   |   Alumni   |   About HKN   |   Contact Us   
HKN Student Services
  

Tutoring
Tutoring Schedule

Course Surveys
EE Professors
EE Teaching Assistants
EE Courses
CS Professors
CS Teaching Assistants
CS Courses

Online Exams
HKN Online Exams

More Student Services
Undergraduate Notes
Graduate School Info
CS GRE Review Notes
Industrial Relations
Useful Links

HKN Shield

Computer Science 196H Spring 1989

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Eugene Lawler (below)

Professor Lawler 3 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Emphasizes conceptual understanding Omitted
Lectures clearly 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Is well prepared 3.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Gives lectures that are well organized Omitted
Summarizes major points Omitted
States objectives for each class session 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 3.5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.0/ 5 ± 3.5
Encourages questions from students 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not Omitted
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding Omitted
Has genuine interest in students 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Relates to students as individuals 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Is accessible to students out of class 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Has an interesting style of presentation Omitted
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.5/ 5 ± 1.7
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Motivates students to do their best work Omitted
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments Omitted
Stimulates your interest in the subject 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding Omitted
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable Omitted
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture Omitted
Pace of the course is too fast 1.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 3.0/ 5 ± 0.0
The required text is beneficial Omitted
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.5/ 7 ± 1.7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.7/ 7 ± 3.0
 

[Statistics for Spring 1989]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.


   Eta Kappa Nu, Mu Chapter 290 cory: (510) 642-7346 www@hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu