Computer Science 194 Spring 2009 Section 8

Computer Science 194 Spring 2009 Section 8

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Brian A. Barsky (below)
Dan Garcia (below)
TA Jeremy Huddleston (below)

Professor Barsky 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.3/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8/ 7 ± 0.6
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions from students 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students outside of class 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 2.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 2.8/ 5 ± 0.8
Pace of the course is too fast 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text/notes is beneficial 2.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Professor Garcia 12 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.8/ 7 ± 0.8
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8/ 7 ± 0.4
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students outside of class 2.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 2.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 2.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 2.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Pace of the course is too fast 3.3/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text/notes is beneficial 2.3/ 5 ± 0.7
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Jeremy Huddleston 11 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is well prepared 4.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Communicates ideas effectively 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Answers questions accurately 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.4/ 5 ± 0.7
Is accessible during office hours 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
 

[Statistics for Spring 2009]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.