Computer Science 186 Spring 2009

Computer Science 186 Spring 2009

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Joseph M. Hellerstein (below)
TAs Peter Alvaro (below)
Kuang Chen (below)

Professor Hellerstein 46 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.9/ 7 ± 0.2
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.2/ 7 ± 0.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.9/ 5 ± 0.1
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.1/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 2.7/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.9/ 5 ± 0.2
 
Teaching Assistant Peter Alvaro 17 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Is well prepared 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Communicates ideas effectively 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Answers questions accurately 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible during office hours 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Kuang Chen 32 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Is well prepared 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Communicates ideas effectively 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Answers questions accurately 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible during office hours 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 3.5/ 5 ± 0.4
 

[Statistics for Spring 2009]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.