Computer Science 186 Spring 1989 Section 2

Computer Science 186 Spring 1989 Section 2

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Morteza Anvari (below)

Professor Anvari 3 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 3.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 2.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 3.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Lectures clearly 3.3/ 5 ± 3.7
Is well prepared 4.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.3/ 5 ± 3.0
Summarizes major points 3.7/ 5 ± 3.7
States objectives for each class session 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Is careful and precise in answering questions 2.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.3/ 5 ± 3.0
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 3.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Encourages questions from students 3.3/ 5 ± 1.5
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.3/ 5 ± 3.0
Has genuine interest in students 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.3/ 5 ± 3.7
Relates to students as individuals 3.3/ 5 ± 3.7
Is accessible to students out of class 3.3/ 5 ± 3.7
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 2.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.3/ 5 ± 3.7
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 3.3/ 5 ± 3.7
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 2.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.3/ 5 ± 3.7
Motivates students to do their best work 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.0/ 5 ± 5.0
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 3.0/ 5 ± 5.0
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.0/ 5 ± 5.0
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.0/ 5 ± 2.5
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 2.7/ 5 ± 1.5
The required text is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 3.0
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.7/ 7 ± 5.2
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.0/ 7 ± 7.5
 

[Statistics for Spring 1989]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.