Computer Science 184 Spring 1990 Section 1

Computer Science 184 Spring 1990 Section 1

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Brian A. Barsky (below)
TAs Peter Lai (below)
Ken Soohoo (below)

Professor Barsky 14 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Discusses recent developments in the field 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Lectures clearly 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Is well prepared 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Summarizes major points 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
States objectives for each class session 3.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Has genuine interest in students 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.7/ 5 ± 0.7
Relates to students as individuals 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Is accessible to students out of class 3.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Motivates students to do their best work 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.1/ 5 ± 0.7
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Pace of the course is too fast 2.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 2.5/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text is beneficial 3.3/ 5 ± 0.8
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.9/ 7 ± 0.4
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.8/ 7 ± 0.5
 
Teaching Assistant Peter Lai
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Ken Soohoo 5 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.6/ 5 ± 0.6
Is well prepared 4.2/ 5 ± 1.0
Communicates ideas effectively 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.2/ 5 ± 1.0
Answers questions accurately 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Is aware when students are having difficulty 4.0/ 5 ± 1.2
Is accessible during office hours 4.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4/ 5 ± 0.6
 

[Statistics for Spring 1990]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.