Computer Science 172 Spring 1992 Section 1

Computer Science 172 Spring 1992 Section 1

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Manuel Blum (below)
TAs W. Evans (below)
D. Hernek (below)

Professor Manuel Blum 20 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.2/ 5 ± 0.4
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.9/ 5 ± 0.1
Lectures clearly 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Is well prepared 4.9/ 5 ± 0.1
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Summarizes major points 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
States objectives for each class session 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.9/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Has genuine interest in students 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 4.5/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 4.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible to students out of class 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 4.0/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 4.8/ 5 ± 0.2
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 4.7/ 5 ± 0.2
Motivates students to do their best work 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.0/ 5 ± 0.5
Stimulates your interest in the subject 4.2/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 2.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
The required text is beneficial 3.4/ 5 ± 0.6
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.5/ 7 ± 0.4
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 4.9/ 7 ± 0.7
 
Teaching Assistant W. Evans
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant D. Hernek
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 1992]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.