Computer Science 170 Spring 2005

Computer Science 170 Spring 2005

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors Christos Papadimitriou (below)
Luca Trevisan (below)
TAs Andrej Bogdanov (below)
Kamalika Chaudhuri (below)
Hoeteck Wee (below)

Professor Papadimitriou 41 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.1/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.6/ 7 ± 0.4
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.1
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.4/ 5 ± 0.2
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.2
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Relates to students as individuals 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.2/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1/ 5 ± 0.4
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Professor Trevisan 40 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 4.6/ 7 ± 0.4
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.4/ 7 ± 0.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 3.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 2.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 3.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions from students 3.7/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Relates to students as individuals 3.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0/ 5 ± 0.2
Pace of the course is too fast 3.0/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 3.3/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Andrej Bogdanov
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Kamalika Chaudhuri
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Hoeteck Wee
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Spring 2005]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.