Computer Science 162 Spring 2006

Computer Science 162 Spring 2006

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Anthony D. Joseph (below)
TAs Dennis Geels (below)
John Jordan (below)
Chris Portka (below)

Professor Joseph 37 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.3/ 7 ± 0.3
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.3/ 7 ± 0.4
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.8/ 5 ± 0.1
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.6/ 5 ± 0.2
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.9/ 5 ± 0.3
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.5/ 5 ± 0.2
Encourages questions from students 4.7/ 5 ± 0.1
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.8/ 5 ± 0.1
Relates to students as individuals 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9/ 5 ± 0.3
The required text/notes is beneficial 3.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.3/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Dennis Geels
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant John Jordan 7 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 3.7/ 5 ± 1.2
Is well prepared 3.7/ 5 ± 1.4
Communicates ideas effectively 3.4/ 5 ± 0.8
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.0/ 5 ± 1.0
Answers questions accurately 3.9/ 5 ± 0.9
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 4.0/ 5 ± 1.0
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.7/ 5 ± 1.5
Is accessible during office hours 3.8/ 5 ± 1.1
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 3.7/ 5 ± 1.2
 
Teaching Assistant Chris Portka 16 Respondents
Helpful in understanding material 4.5/ 5 ± 0.3
Is well prepared 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Communicates ideas effectively 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
Answers questions accurately 4.2/ 5 ± 0.3
Encourages questions and/or class discussion 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Is aware when students are having difficulty 3.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible during office hours 4.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness 4.4/ 5 ± 0.3
 

[Statistics for Spring 2006]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.