Computer Science 162 Fall 1990 Section 1

Computer Science 162 Fall 1990 Section 1

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructor Alan J. Smith (below)
TAs J. Mott-smith (below)
S. Smoot (below)

Professor Alan J. Smith 17 Respondents
Discusses points of view other than his/her own 4.1/ 5 ± 0.4
Discusses recent developments in the field 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives references for more interesting & invovled points 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Emphasizes conceptual understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Lectures clearly 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Is well prepared 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.6/ 5 ± 0.3
Summarizes major points 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
States objectives for each class session 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.1/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 3.9/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Demonstrates familiarity with subject matter 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions from students 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Knows if the class is understanding him/her or not 3.8/ 5 ± 0.4
Has students apply concepts to demonstrate understanding 3.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Has genuine interest in students 3.7/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives personal help to students having problems in course 3.4/ 5 ± 0.4
Relates to students as individuals 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Is accessible to students out of class 3.5/ 5 ± 0.5
Is valued for advice not directly related to the course 3.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Has an interesting style of presentation 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about his/her subject 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Varies the speed and tone of his/her voice 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Has concern for the quality of his/her teaching 3.9/ 5 ± 0.6
Motivates students to do their best work 3.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.5/ 5 ± 0.6
Stimulates your interest in the subject 3.7/ 5 ± 0.5
Gives exams permitting students to show understanding 3.4/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.9/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 2.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Course is concerned with theory more than its application 3.1/ 5 ± 0.5
The required text is beneficial 3.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Work load is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 2.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 5.4/ 7 ± 0.7
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 5.5/ 7 ± 0.4
 
Teaching Assistant J. Mott-smith
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant S. Smoot
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Fall 1990]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.