Computer Science 152 Fall 2004

Computer Science 152 Fall 2004

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
Instructors John Lazzaro (below)
David A. Patterson (below)
TAs Douglas Densmore (below)
Ted Hong (below)
Brandon Ooi (below)

Professor Lazzaro 9 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.2/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.0/ 7 ± 1.5
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.8/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.3/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Encourages questions from students 4.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Relates to students as individuals 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.3/ 5 ± 0.5
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 4.0/ 5 ± 0.6
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 3.8/ 5 ± 1.0
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.1/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.7/ 5 ± 0.8
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 3.8/ 5 ± 0.6
Pace of the course is too fast 2.9/ 5 ± 1.1
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Professor Patterson 10 Respondents
Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor 6.2/ 7 ± 0.6
How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? 6.3/ 7 ± 1.3
Gives lectures that are well organized 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Is enthusiastic about the subject matter 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Identifies what he/she considers important 4.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Has an interesting style of presentation 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively 4.6/ 5 ± 0.5
Encourages questions from students 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
Is careful and precise in answering questions 4.3/ 5 ± 0.6
Relates to students as individuals 4.7/ 5 ± 0.4
Is accessible to students outside of class 4.0/ 5 ± 0.8
Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours 5.0/ 5 ± 0.0
Gives interesting and stimulating assignments 4.1/ 5 ± 0.9
Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding 4.2/ 5 ± 0.5
Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable 3.9/ 5 ± 0.7
Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture 4.0/ 5 ± 0.4
Pace of the course is too fast 3.1/ 5 ± 1.1
The required text/notes is beneficial 4.6/ 5 ± 0.4
Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit 4.8/ 5 ± 0.3
 
Teaching Assistant Douglas Densmore
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Ted Hong
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 
Teaching Assistant Brandon Ooi
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
 

[Statistics for Fall 2004]

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.