CS 152

Computer Science 152

[Email HKN about this data] [Info about this page]
TitleComputer Architecture and Engineeringtrend
Instructors in ChargeDavid E. Culler, John Wawrzynek
Units5
Prerequisites61C.
DescriptionInstruction set design, Register Transfer. Computer design project requiring about 100 hours. Data-path design. Controller design. Memory system. Addressing. Microprogramming. Computer arithmetic. Survey of real computers and microprocessors.
Newsgroupucb.class.cs152

Sections Instructor Teaching EffectivenessHow worthwhile was this course?
Spring 2009Asanovic6.5/ 7 ± 0.4
6.6/ 7 ± 0.3
Spring 2008Asanovic6.4/ 7 ± 0.3
6.6/ 7 ± 0.3
Fall 2006Lazzaro6.0/ 7 ± 0.3
6.2/ 7 ± 0.3
Fall 2005Lazzaro6.5/ 7 ± 0.3
6.5/ 7 ± 0.4
Spring 2005Lazzaro6.3/ 7 ± 0.6
6.9/ 7 ± 0.4
Fall 2004Lazzaro (1/2)6.2/ 7 ± 0.6
6.0/ 7 ± 1.5
Fall 2004Patterson (2/2)6.2/ 7 ± 0.6
6.3/ 7 ± 1.3
Spring 2004Kubiatowicz6.4/ 7 ± 0.3
6.6/ 7 ± 0.3
Fall 2003Patterson6.3/ 7 ± 0.3
6.2/ 7 ± 0.4
Spring 2003Kubiatowicz6.5/ 7 ± 0.3
6.6/ 7 ± 0.3
Fall 2002Katz5.3/ 7 ± 0.6
4.8/ 7 ± 0.8
Spring 2002Brodersen5.0/ 7 ± 1.2
5.7/ 7 ± 0.8
Fall 2001Kubiatowicz6.5/ 7 ± 0.4
6.0/ 7 ± 0.6
Spring 2001Kubiatowicz6.5/ 7 ± 0.2
6.4/ 7 ± 0.3
Fall 2000Brodersen5.5/ 7 ± 0.5
5.2/ 7 ± 0.6
Spring 2000Brodersen5.7/ 7 ± 0.4
6.4/ 7 ± 0.3
Fall 1999Kubiatowicz6.7/ 7 ± 0.2
6.5/ 7 ± 0.3
Spring 1999Kubiatowicz6.5/ 7 ± 0.2
6.5/ 7 ± 0.2
Fall 1998Brodersen5.8/ 7 ± 0.4
6.0/ 7 ± 0.3
Spring 1998Wawrzynek5.5/ 7 ± 0.6
6.1/ 7 ± 0.4
Fall 1997Patterson6.6/ 7 ± 0.2
6.4/ 7 ± 0.2
Spring 1997Jeong3.8/ 7 ± 0.5
5.6/ 7 ± 0.7
Fall 1996Culler6.3/ 7 ± 0.3
6.5/ 7 ± 0.3
Spring 1996Culler6.4/ 7 ± 0.2
6.5/ 7 ± 0.2
Fall 1995 Section 1Patterson6.3/ 7 ± 0.6
6.6/ 7 ± 0.6
Fall 1995 Section 2Patterson6.5/ 7 ± 0.3
6.6/ 7 ± 0.3
Spring 1995 Section 1Kong (1/2)6.7/ 7 ± 0.2
6.7/ 7 ± 0.2
Spring 1995 Section 1Patterson (2/2)6.7/ 7 ± 0.2
6.7/ 7 ± 0.2
Spring 1995 Section 2Kong (1/2)6.0/ 7 ± 0.0
6.5/ 7 ± 6.3
Spring 1995 Section 2Patterson (2/2)6.3/ 7 ± 1.5
6.5/ 7 ± 1.7
Spring 1994 Section 1Wawrzynek5.9/ 7 ± 0.7
5.6/ 7 ± 0.8
Spring 1994 Section 2Wawrzynek5.4/ 7 ± 0.7
5.9/ 7 ± 0.7
Fall 1993 Section 1Culler6.0/ 7 ± 0.3
6.0/ 7 ± 0.5
Fall 1993 Section 2Culler5.8/ 7 ± 0.4
5.8/ 7 ± 0.5
Spring 1993Ramamoorthy3.6/ 7 ± 1.1
6.1/ 7 ± 0.6
Fall 1992 Section 1Wawrzynek5.7/ 7 ± 0.5
5.9/ 7 ± 0.4
Fall 1992 Section 2Wawrzynek5.2/ 7 ± 0.4
5.5/ 7 ± 0.4
Spring 1992 Section 1Wawrzynek4.8/ 7 ± 0.4
5.5/ 7 ± 0.4
Spring 1992 Section 2Wawrzynek5.5/ 7 ± 0.4
6.2/ 7 ± 0.3
Fall 1991 Section 1Culler6.2/ 7 ± 0.4
5.9/ 7 ± 0.5
Fall 1991 Section 2Culler5.5/ 7 ± 0.4
5.6/ 7 ± 0.4
Spring 1991 Section 1Ramamoorthy4.4/ 7 ± 0.5
5.4/ 7 ± 0.9
Spring 1991 Section 2Ramamoorthy3.9/ 7 ± 1.0
4.9/ 7 ± 1.0
Fall 1990 Section 1Culler5.6/ 7 ± 0.5
6.4/ 7 ± 0.3
Fall 1990 Section 2Culler5.4/ 7 ± 0.4
5.2/ 7 ± 0.6
Spring 1990 Section 1Oklobdzija3.2/ 7 ± 0.6
5.0/ 7 ± 0.5
Spring 1990 Section 2Oklobdzija3.9/ 7 ± 0.6
5.1/ 7 ± 0.6
Fall 1989 Section 1Ramamoorthy4.5/ 7 ± 0.9
5.6/ 7 ± 1.0
Fall 1989 Section 2Ramamoorthy3.9/ 7 ± 0.7
5.2/ 7 ± 0.6
Spring 1989 Section 1Katz6.2/ 7 ± 0.3
5.4/ 7 ± 0.3
Spring 1989 Section 2Katz6.4/ 7 ± 0.2
6.1/ 7 ± 0.3
Fall 1988Ramamoorthy3.2/ 7 ± 0.5
5.1/ 7 ± 0.5

   
Overall Rating Teaching EffectivenessHow worthwhile was this course?
Computer Science 152 5.9/ 7 ± 0.0
6.2/ 7 ± 0.0

Hint: You can click on the colored rating bars to see detailed statistics on a particular rating.


Powered by GoodProfOrNot.