| Professor McGeer |
22 Respondents |
|---|
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
2.3 | / 7 ± 0.5 | |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
4.5 | / 7 ± 0.8 | |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
2.2 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
3.8 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
2.3 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
1.6 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
2.2 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Encourages questions from students |
2.7 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
2.4 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Relates to students as individuals |
2.6 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
3.5 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours |
3.0 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
2.1 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
2.1 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
2.7 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
2.5 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
2.9 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| The required text/notes is beneficial |
2.7 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
4.5 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| |
| Professor Pister |
22 Respondents |
|---|
| Rate the overall teaching effectiveness of this instructor |
5.1 | / 7 ± 0.4 | |
| How worthwhile was this course compared with others at U.C.? |
5.4 | / 7 ± 0.6 | |
| Gives lectures that are well organized |
3.9 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Is enthusiastic about the subject matter |
4.3 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Identifies what he/she considers important |
4.0 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Has an interesting style of presentation |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Uses visual aids and blackboards effectively |
3.6 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Encourages questions from students |
3.8 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Is careful and precise in answering questions |
4.2 | / 5 ± 0.3 | |
| Relates to students as individuals |
3.9 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| Is accessible to students outside of class |
3.5 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Is amicable and helpful to students during office hours |
4.1 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Gives interesting and stimulating assignments |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Gives exams that permit students to show their understanding |
2.8 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Uses a grading system that is clearly defined and equitable |
3.3 | / 5 ± 0.6 | |
| Required course material is sufficiently covered in lecture |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Pace of the course is too fast |
3.1 | / 5 ± 0.5 | |
| The required text/notes is beneficial |
2.9 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| Workload is heavier than for courses of comparable credit |
4.5 | / 5 ± 0.4 | |
| |
| Teaching Assistant Shah Bawany |
6 Respondents |
|---|
| Helpful in understanding material |
3.7 | / 5 ± 1.5 | |
| Is well prepared |
3.5 | / 5 ± 1.4 | |
| Communicates ideas effectively |
3.5 | / 5 ± 1.4 | |
| Appears to have a good knowledge of the subject matter |
4.3 | / 5 ± 0.7 | |
| Answers questions accurately |
3.5 | / 5 ± 1.6 | |
| Encourages questions and/or class discussion |
2.8 | / 5 ± 1.0 | |
| Is aware when students are having difficulty |
2.8 | / 5 ± 1.4 | |
| Is accessible during office hours |
3.0 | / 5 ± 1.3 | |
| Rate the T.A.'s overall teaching effectiveness |
3.5 | / 5 ± 1.4 | |
| |
| Teaching Assistant Ken Elkabany |
|---|
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
|
| |
| Teaching Assistant Chen-li Sun |
|---|
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
|
| |
| Teaching Assistant Ke Xu |
|---|
|
This instructor's ratings are hidden.
|
| |
